- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:22:29 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 14/07/14 06:01, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 12 July 2014 07:36, Stefan Håkansson LK
> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>> ...getUserMedia({audio: false, video: true, source:
>>> "application|livecapture"}, ...)
>>
>> Could someone expand a bit on this one? What would it look like if you
>> wanted a camera (not application) - with and without constraints (just a
>> simple example with e.g. frameRate) supplied? Can constraints be
>> supplied if the source is "application"? How? Etc.
>
>
> getUserMedia({video: true})
>
> getUserMedia({video: {frameRate: 29.97}})
>
> getUserMedia({video: true, source: "capture"})
> // same as first, explicit source instead of relying on the default
..and would become
getUserMedia({video: {frameRate: 29.97}, source: "capture"})
with constraints applied
>
> getUserMedia({video: { width: 640 }, source: "application"})
> // screen-cap, supports all constraints
Thanks for supplying the examples. I like this model.
Stefan
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 06:22:55 UTC