- From: Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@quicinc.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:16:47 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- CC: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
I assume this is not meant to impact non-WebRTC methods for media transmission - right? For instance, what if the MediaTrack is recorded and sent via XHR or WS to some destination? -Giri -----Original Message----- From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 11:00 AM To: Stefan Håkansson LK Cc: Eric Rescorla; Mandyam, Giridhar; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; public-media-capture@w3.org Subject: Re: [Bug 22594] noaccess / peerIdentity as constraints On 24 February 2014 07:31, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > But to get me on the right page: the idea with connecting the identity > with the tracks is to be able to inform the user in the permission > prompt that the media can only be sent to a certain user. Is that right? Correct. I believe that "trust" is something that should be scoped appropriately, always.
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 19:17:17 UTC