- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:55:45 +0200
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Le vendredi 22 août 2014 à 09:08 +0000, Stefan Håkansson LK a écrit : > > --- Comment #4 from Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> --- > > Proposed fix: > > https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/commit/30c1812084ceee87761f2ee4af9a123b0a604ec6 > > Looks good to me I'm personally a bit skeptical we can change navigator.getUserMedia to navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia now; there is quite a bit of existing documentation and knowledge around the existing navigator.getUserMedia. While esthetically I can understand the change, I don't think aesthetics have sufficient values to justify the cost of explaining to thousands of developers that their existing navigator.getUserMedia = navigator.webkitGetUserdia || navigator.mozGetUserMedia; is worth fixing. Was there another reason to prefer that change? (over to just leave getUserMedia entirely out of MediaDevices) Dom
Received on Friday, 22 August 2014 13:56:00 UTC