- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 06:40:44 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 29/10/13 19:20, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 29 October 2013 11:04, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Can you write up a complete >>> use case where you will want to use the "noaccess" constraint > > Another use case: "Pre-negotiate Session" > > A user browses an unfamiliar site where they require assistance from a > support agent. They are prompted to accept a real-time session with > the support agent. The user accepts the call and then provides > (temporary) consent for access to their camera and microphone. The > user expects to be able to speak immediately upon granting consent. > > In order to ensure that the session is effectively live prior to > consent being granted, session negotiation must have completed. The > application is able to use a stream marked with a "noaccess" > constraint to build a session, thereby ensuring that the session is > live when the user grants their consent to access live media. Do you with session being live mean that the MediaStream has been added to a PeerConnection (and has been negotiated)? I think Ekr has stated that a noaccess stream could not be added to a PeerConnection, so there would have to be some more changes I guess.
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 06:41:08 UTC