- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:12:38 +0200
- To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 10/21/2013 07:05 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: > On 2013-10-19 21:42, Martin Thomson wrote: >> On 18 October 2013 21:57, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> >> wrote: >>> the only argument I can think of in favour of using "kind" to indicate >>> audioOut is that it doesn't trip up code that is only looking at the >>> "kind" field. >> >> It's a good argument. You could also change "audio" to "audioIn" if >> you feel that symmetry is necessary. >> > > For some reason I don't think camel case looks that nice in string > literals. I suggested "audio-output" and "audio-input" in an earlier > mail. Given that most of the API uses camelCase or CamelCase, I find dashes jarring.
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 05:13:04 UTC