Re: Breaking down proposal related to constraints

On 28/11/13 18:29, cowwoc wrote:
> Done. Should I share this proposal with public-webrtc, or restrict it to
> this list?

I think we should keep it on this list for the time being.

>
> Thanks,
> Gili
>
> On 28/11/2013 3:59 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
>> On 27/11/13 19:10, cowwoc wrote:
>>> Stefan,
>>>
>>> I'd like to get to a point where I can open a bug to track my own
>>> proposal (a mechanism for "sanitizing" Javascript functions to remove
>>> the risk of fingerprinting). I haven't really received sufficient
>>> feedback for it. Adam liked it, Martin did not (though the reason was
>>> vague). I responded to Martin's post but got no reply.
>>>
>>> I would appreciate your advise on getting more feedback for it.
>> Hi Gili,
>>
>> I think what you need to do is to generate more interest for your idea
>> on this mail list. There have been quite few comments so far. My guess
>> would be that you would need to make a more concrete proposal on how
>> 'the browser to "sanitize"´ should work.
>>
>> In this case we did file bugs since Jan-Ivar's proposal had already
>> gotten a lot of attention and feedback - that is not the case (yet) for
>> your proposal.
>>
>
>


Received on Friday, 29 November 2013 07:25:22 UTC