Re: Proposed new text for noaccess from Martin Thomson on 2013-11-05 (public-media-capture@w3.org from November 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:28:23 -0800
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV35qM6W1P=7_NoQLQdH_xJ+AXs1mFEnd9EfkdHqzC--w@mail.gmail.com>

On 5 November 2013 11:13, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> BTW, I'll repeat what I said before in another context: if we change
> getUserMedia's behaviour, I'd much prefer to see a new call that is NOT
> called getUserMedia, and a short Javascript snippet that shows how to
> emulate getUserMedia on top of the new function (which has a new name).

I can live with that.

If you want a proposal, I'm willing to write something up.

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 19:28:50 UTC