Re: [Bug 22365] New: The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.

(keeping the generic discussion on the list rather than in buganizer - 
the thread can get long)

I think we should not have an option if we don't have a really 
compellling reason to have one - behaviour that changes according to 
decisions taken elsewhere tends to complicate the API.



On 06/14/2013 02:45 PM, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22365
>
>              Bug ID: 22365
>             Summary: The spec should explicitly say something about
>                      getUserMedia() in an iframe.
>      Classification: Unclassified
>             Product: WebRTC Working Group
>             Version: unspecified
>            Hardware: All
>                  OS: All
>              Status: NEW
>            Severity: normal
>            Priority: P2
>           Component: Media Capture and Streams
>            Assignee: public-media-capture@w3.org
>            Reporter: adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com
>                  CC: public-media-capture@w3.org
>
> I think we should allow this. There was a suggestion to not allow
> getUserMedia() in an iframe [1], but the people who expressed their opinions
> seemd to have a different view.
>
> A possible way to keep some of the increased security, gained by not allowing,
> is to disallow it by default, but let the main page to opt in to allow an
> iframe to use getUserMedia().
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2012Mar/0085.html
>
was this the wrong link? This link points to Dom's request to abandon 
the two-callbacks pattern.

Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 10:25:44 UTC