On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Rachel Blum <groby@chromium.org> wrote: > Curious - if we implement disk backing store, should the disk space usage > count against the temporary HTML5 storage? (In which case the app could > query usage/quota for a bit more fine-grained control than LOW_MEMORY) > I think temporary storage that will go away when the page closes should be in a different bucket from storage that will survive the page. The latter is likely to be much more valuable than the former. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 23:33:12 UTC