W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Going forward with FPWD-ing the Recording API

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:22:46 +0100
Message-ID: <50FFF236.2030200@ericsson.com>
To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-01-23 15:13, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote:
> Hi Stefan, Qualcomm Innovation Center (QuIC) renews its objection to
> this spec being made an FPWD.

Hi Giri, could you elaborate a bit on why you object?
>
> I have also pointed out to the Editors that based on my understanding
> this is a deliverable by the Media Capture TF and not the WebRTC WG,
> but the front matter still states "This document was published by the
> Web Real-Time Communication Working Group as an Editor's Draft".  Can
> we at least clarify where this spec belongs, and modify the
> corresponding charter accordingly?  If it is truly a WebRTC WG
> deliverable, then I may withdraw the objection on procedural grounds
> as QuIC is not a member of the WebRTC WG.

This is clearly a deliverable of the Media Capture TF (recording was 
part of the original version of the "Media Streams and Capture" document 
but was moved into its own document). The draft should be updated to say 
this.

Best regards,
Stefan

>
> -Giri Mandyam
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Håkansson LK
> [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] Sent: Friday, January 18,
> 2013 4:22 AM To: public-media-capture@w3.org Subject: Going forward
> with FPWD-ing the Recording API
>
> Hi all,
>
> at the last teleconf (December 6 2012) there was a discussion
> regarding publishing the Recording API proposal we're working on as a
> FPWD (unfortunately the minutes are not yet available).
>
> The outcome of that discussion was (this is the recollection of the
> chairs) that the Editor's should do one more iteration, and then we
> would return to the question.
>
> On December 20 the Editor's sent out an updated Editor's draft [1].
>
> We would now like to move forward. Unless the TF thinks we should not
> do this, we intend to initiate calls for consensus to publish as FPWD
> in the DAP and WebRTC WGs next week.
>
> So, if you think this is a bad idea, say so on this mail list!
>
> Stefan for the chairs
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2012Dec/att-0159/RecordingProposal.html
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 14:23:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:03 GMT