W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > January 2013

RE: Constraints or not ?

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 19:34:10 +0000
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
CC: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9768D477C67135458BF978A45BCF9B3853B341BB@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
I just added notices and redirects on the older drafts to avoid this problem in the future. Thanks!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:10 AM
> To: Travis Leithead
> Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK; Cullen Jennings; public-media-capture@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Constraints or not ?
> 
> 
> wow - sorry - not sure how that happened but  you are right I was looking
> at the wrong version
> 
> 
> On Jan 2, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Travis Leithead
> <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think you are looking at v5. Sorry, I should have put a redirect in
> place to v6... but you can just change the 5 to a 6 in the URL and get to
> the most recent proposal.
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) [fluffy@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 1:06 PM
> > To: Stefan Håkansson LK
> > Cc: Cullen Jennings; public-media-capture@w3.org
> > Subject: Constraints or not ?
> >
> > On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:49 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK
> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2) seem to go against many of the decisions we already made about
> >>> constraints.
> >>
> >> Again, some elaboration would be nice. When I read the proposal I get
> the impression that it is well aligned to how we have been using
> constraints so far. You can use constraints when changing some settings in
> the same way as they have been proposed to be used with getUserMedia
> before if I understand correctly.
> >
> > So I thought the WG had decided in the various WG meetings we were going
> to use constraints to set this sort of stuff, but when I read this doc, I
> see things like
> >
> > pictureDevice.redEyeReduction.request(true,true);
> >
> > This seems a completely different API model to me and given the amount
> of time that went into the constrains discussion, unless someone has a
> concrete example of where constraints can't work, I'm not keen on
> reopening that.
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 19:35:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:03 GMT