- From: Stefan Hĺkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:42:37 +0000
- To: José Luis Millán <jmillan@aliax.net>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3c.org" <public-media-capture@w3c.org>
On 2013-08-13 15:57, José Luis Millán wrote: > Harald said: > >> One still open question is whether a track can be a member of multiple streams; there are ease-of-implementation issues that argue for saying > "no"; there are orthogonality arguments that argue "yes".(If the answer > is "no", I would argue that we should have a nullable "stream" property > on the track, and that AddTrack throws an exception if the "stream" > property of a track that's added is not null. That makes it predictable > for the API what happens if you try to add a track to a stream.) > > Was it finally decided whether a track can be a member of multiple > streams or not? I think we never did formally decide, but my take of it is: * The current Draft says a track can be member of multiple streams * Harald proposed it should not be allowed * There was not really any consensus to change, so what is in the draft is still valid Do you see it differently Harald? > > I can't find the answer in the mail archives. > > Thanks > > -- > José Luis Millán
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 09:43:01 UTC