- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:24:39 +0000
- To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
I don't think that devices with a left and/or right-oriented camera can even come close to the distribution of mobile devices that have front/rear cameras. I'd prefer to stick with the basic front/back and then see if need to augment in a future version of the standard. From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com] On Mar 27, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > I assume that you want to extend the "facing" enumeration to encompass > new properties: > > "rear": pointed (approximately) from the device to the space directly > away from the device user > "front": pointed (approximately) from the device directly toward the > device user "left" pointed (approximately) from the device to the > space to the device user's left "right" pointed (approximately) from > the device to the space to the device user's right Yes, that sounds good. I think this represents the optimal point on the slope as it represents what we have deployed today in millions of devices. This would solve a bunch of issues for me - does anyone see any harm in using this as the stawman list to move forward with?
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:27:08 UTC