- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:07:17 +0100
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > A little googling ( https://github.com/whatwg/dom/commits) shows that Anne > added futures to the whatwg spec for DOM a whole whooping 11 days ago: > https://github.com/whatwg/dom/commit/1268f9ead6413b21a03f266496c52295a70e38e7 Sure, as the result of months of discussion and years of experimentation by the developer community. And papers on this subject go back to 1977 as I pointed out earlier on. > And algorithm changes were going into this spec 3 days ago: > https://github.com/whatwg/dom/commit/6f518ecbb6385f94284d917f4ea08f8089b382e3 Those are not algorithm changes. > This isn't just asking us to adopt ideas that have gathered consensus in the > community. It is. >> Frankly, I was expecting anyone with any JS programming experience to be >> dancing at the availability of Futures. I'm a bit surprised at the >> reluctance. Seconded. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 13:07:49 UTC