W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > April 2013

Re: VideoStreamTrack: takePhoto()

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:28:05 +0200
Message-ID: <51629BB5.4070006@w3.org>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
CC: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 08/04/2013 10:27 , Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> Fully agreed. Your task is to convince us that the idea has technical
> merit.

To be fair, in 2013, I would think that the onus of technical proof 
ought to fall on whoever is *rejecting* Futures. Futures are designed to 
be the one true way of handling precisely what Anne is proposing them 
for here, and I am unaware of any opposition to this consensus.

We've been discussing this for a while. Now we have a solution. Unless 
there are genuine, technically grounded concerns with Futures the time 
to use them is now.

Frankly, I was expecting anyone with any JS programming experience to be 
dancing at the availability of Futures. I'm a bit surprised at the 
reluctance.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 10:28:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:24:40 UTC