W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > April 2013

Re: VideoStreamTrack: takePhoto()

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:28:01 +0200
Message-ID: <515D47A1.8090100@alvestrand.no>
To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 04/03/2013 06:49 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> I like the concept of futures, but this WG and TF are already an early
>> adopter of a lot of stuff.
> I don't really think that's a valid reason to reject this. The
> callback stuff you're using at the moment is similarly a quite recent
> addition to the platform toolkit, but a lot worse to develop with for
> accept/reject tasks.
>
> I'm happy to use the basic W3C Process to get my way, but I'd prefer a
> friendlier dialogue.

I'm absolutely not happy to use the W3C process to get my way instead of 
trying to figure out what's best.... can you point us to some deployed 
technology that's using the futures according to the newly minted 
specification, so that we can see what other people's experience with 
both implementing it and using it in applications are?
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2013 09:28:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:24:40 UTC