RE: recording

Why only use timeslice, can we have a size argument, for example, 2M, 5K etc.

Yang
Huawei


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Barnett [mailto:Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:39 PM
> To: Adam Bergkvist; Harald Alvestrand
> Cc: public-media-capture@w3.org
> Subject: RE: recording
> 
> Yes, I was thinking of this as one class with two different methods.
> However, as Adam's subsequent email indicates, it could be one class
> with one method: startRecord(optional timeslice),  where you get
> all-at-once recording if timeslice is omitted.  I thought it was a bit
> clearer to have two different methods, but don't  feel strongly about
> it.  (I did intend the 'buffersize' argument to indicate number of
> milliseconds, so 'timeslice' is a better name for it.)
> 
> - Jim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Bergkvist [mailto:adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:15 AM
> To: Harald Alvestrand
> Cc: public-media-capture@w3.org
> Subject: Re: recording
> 
> On 2012-11-13 12:18, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> > On 11/12/2012 08:42 PM, Jim Barnett wrote:
> >>
> >> Here's a summary of what I think we agreed to in Lyon.  If we still
> >> agree to it, I will start writing it up.  (Please send comments on
> >> any or all of the points below.)
> >>
> > I think I like this. I'd like to see this as a proposal.
> >>
> >> Recording should be implemented by a separate class.  Its constructor
> 
> >> will take a MediaStream as an argument  (we can define it to take
> >> other types as well, if we choose, but no one is suggesting any at
> >> the
> >> moment.)
> >>
> >> There are two kinds of recording:
> >>
> >> 1)incremental, in which (smaller) Blobs of data are returned to the
> >> application as they are available.
> >>
> >> 2)All-at-once, in which one big Blob of data is made available when
> >> recording is finished.
> >>
> > So are these 2 classes that both take a MediaStream as a constructor
> > argument?
> > This might be simpler than having one merged class that does both.
> 
> I read the proposal as one class with two different record methods.
> 
> /Adam
>

Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 09:23:53 UTC