- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:55:47 +0000
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
>>> The most urgent need right now seems to be to collect >>> use-cases/scenarios and requirements in a document. Would you be willing >>> to edit such a document? >> >> Would love to. >Excellent! > >Could you start a document at http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/ ? >That is where the very first draft is stored as well. Cvs is used for >revision control. I can certainly do that. I've actually started work on a document on the Mercurial server [1] on the W3C, since: 1. Mercurial seems to be the version control system that new specs at the W3C are being authored in (see Indexed DB [2] (in WebApps WG), User Timing [3] (in Perf WG), and Contacts API [4] (DAP, recently migrated). 2. It was _much_ less work to get started in that system than legacy CVS (since I only have a user/password combo and not a public/private key pair--yet). I'm not certain if there are other pros/cons for/against using Mercurial as I'm fairly new to it... If you don't mind having the doc on Mercurial, that's easier for me. I've set up a folder at: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/media-stream-capture/ However, I'm just as happy to work with good-old CVS also :) Let me know if you'd still like to move forward with the CVS location. -Travis [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ [2] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html [3] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/UserTiming/Overview.html [4] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/ce922ee80ed2/contacts/Overview.html
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 17:56:22 UTC