- From: Joakim Soderberg <soderberg.pj@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 10:51:13 -0800
- To: Werner Bailer <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
- Cc: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, Florian Stegmaier <florian.stegmaier@uni-passau.de>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, Joakim Soderberg <j.soderberg@samsung.com>
I think the suggested title is an improvement. On 01 Mar 2014, at 07:30, Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at> wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > thanks, good news ! > > No objection to the title change. > > Best regards, > Werner > > > ________________________________________ > Von: Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org] > Gesendet: Samstag, 01. März 2014 12:51 > An: Florian Stegmaier; public-media-annotation@w3.org; Bailer, Werner; Joakim Soderberg > Betreff: Transition to REC for "API for Media Resources 1.0". > > Hi, > > This is to let you know that the W3C Director has approuved to move "API > for Media Resources 1.0" to REC [1] > > yes finally ;-))) > > Remains a small issue, before publishing the REC. > > The Director is sympathetic with the suggestion from a W3C member > during the PR review, to add the word "Metadata" to the beginning of > the title, as he says that indeed it makes it clearer. > " Without qualifying "API", it will be confused with other media related > API functionality." > > So the question is: > > Who from the MAWG would disapprove the change of Title ? > from > "API for Media Resources 1.0" > to > "Metadata API for Media Resources 1.0" > > If there are no objection by next friday, I will request publication of > this spec as REC. > > Thierry > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/REC/ > > >
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2014 18:51:44 UTC