RE: MAWG - update RDF

Me too and I insist that these are corrections and not changes.

Best, JP

From: Joakim Soderberg [mailto:soderberg.pj@gmail.com]
Sent: jeudi, 21. mars 2013 16:40
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: MAWG - update RDF

I hope it gets accepted. Thierry, will this have to be published as a separate version?

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch<mailto:evain@ebu.ch>> wrote:
Dear all,

A group of MAWG members are making a submission to an RFT from ISO/JPEG proposing to adopt our ma-ont ontology.

This submission contains links to the rdf and ttl files accessible from:

http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl

A couple of corrections have proved to be required with no impact on the ontology structure:

1/ surprisingly the reference to DublinCore in RDF (e.g. used for comments) was broken and had to be replaced
2/ the collectionName property used to be declared as a subclass of rdfs:label but this generates problems. Therefore collectionName is now just a dataProperty like for title, description, etc.
3/ we have added a comment saying that the rdf an ttl files take precedence over the specification, which contains a copy of the rdf file (and we think that the corrections made do not justify going through a revision of the specification itself).

This work has been carried out in collaboration with Pierre-Antoine Champin (who also generated the ttl file) and Tobias Buerger.

The corrected files are attached and we have asked Thierry Michel to upload these new versions in place of the existing ones.

We hope that this is agreeable to all members of the MAWG.

Best regards,

Jean-Pierre
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************