Re: MAWG - update RDF

I hope it gets accepted. Thierry, will this have to be published as a
separate version?


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> A group of MAWG members are making a submission to an RFT from ISO/JPEG
> proposing to adopt our ma-ont ontology.
>
> This submission contains links to the rdf and ttl files accessible from:
>
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
>
> A couple of corrections have proved to be required with no impact on the
> ontology structure:
>
> 1/ surprisingly the reference to DublinCore in RDF (e.g. used for
> comments) was broken and had to be replaced
> 2/ the collectionName property used to be declared as a subclass of
> rdfs:label but this generates problems. Therefore collectionName is now
> just a dataProperty like for title, description, etc.
> 3/ we have added a comment saying that the rdf an ttl files take
> precedence over the specification, which contains a copy of the rdf file
> (and we think that the corrections made do not justify going through a
> revision of the specification itself).
>
> This work has been carried out in collaboration with Pierre-Antoine
> Champin (who also generated the ttl file) and Tobias Buerger.
>
> The corrected files are attached and we have asked Thierry Michel to
> upload these new versions in place of the existing ones.
>
> We hope that this is agreeable to all members of the MAWG.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system
> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
> by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>