W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > July 2013

RE: review Proposed Recommendation version of the API for Media Resources 1.0

From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:38:50 +0200
To: Joakim Soderberg <soderberg.pj@gmail.com>, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09F010FF3C5414B@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
Hi Joakim,

> Perhaps "on the fly" is somewhat casual for
> a specification. Consider saying online instead.

Personally I'm ok with on the fly, but we can change it with an alternative. However, I find "online" is ambiguous in a Web context. 

Best regards,
Werner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joakim Soderberg [mailto:soderberg.pj@gmail.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 02. Juli 2013 06:04
> To: Thierry MICHEL
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: review Proposed Recommendation version of the API for Media
> Resources 1.0
> 
> I can't find any major issues after a first review.
> I like the updated Figure 1, and I had no problem following the accompanying
> text describing the two scenarios. Perhaps "on the fly" is somewhat casual for
> a specification. Consider saying online instead.
> 
> -JS
> 
> On 26 Jun 2013, at 01:26, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > All,
> >
> > Here is the Proposed Recommendation version of the API for Media
> > Resources 1.0
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/PR2/
> >
> > Please review carefully this document.
> >
> > This will be the last review before going to final Recommendation.
> >
> > Thanks for you help.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Thierry
> >
> >
> 
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 11:39:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:47 UTC