W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2012

Re: AW: Panel on Schema.org in San Francisco

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:27:04 +0200
Message-ID: <4FD60038.90703@w3.org>
To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
CC: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Werner,

Thank you for pointing to the schema.org mapping I had published.

This additional mapping format is informative only and not part of the 
REC. (The REC is frozen).

At some point, when we do have more Additional Multimedia metadata 
formats mapping tables


We could add those formats in the "Testsuite for the Ontology for Media 
Resources 1.0"
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html

adding the corresponding RDF, Turtle and XML Example

We could republish a new Spec ( Last Call, CR, PR and REC).

Thierry.


Le 11/06/2012 15:48, Bailer, Werner a écrit :
>> We actually have a mapping already since two months done by me and
>> Maria. Where is it by the way? What status?
>
> The mappings done after moving the ontology doc to REC are here: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional-mappings.html
>
>> Actually, what could be relevant is to write an ma-ont RDF instance and write
>> the equivalent schema.org in Microdata and RDFa Lite.
>
> Yes, absolutely. We have done that as part of the test suite for the other formats: one instance in the original source format (which has in this case 2 serialisations) and the mapping to an MA compliant RDF.
>
> Werner
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Evain, Jean-Pierre [mailto:evain@ebu.ch]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 11. Juni 2012 15:35
>> An: tmichel@w3.org; Dan Brickley
>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Betreff: RE: Panel on Schema.org in San Francisco
>>
>> We actually have a mapping already since two months done by me and
>> Maria. Where is it by the way? What status?
>>
>> Actually, what could be relevant is to write an ma-ont RDF instance and write
>> the equivalent schema.org in Microdata and RDFa Lite.
>>
>> Jean-Pierre
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
>> Sent: 11 June 2012 15:25
>> To: Dan Brickley
>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Panel on Schema.org in San Francisco
>>
>> Thanks Dan for your valuable info.
>> We were thinking about adding a new mapping of our Ontology to
>> Schema.org.
>>
>> Thierry.
>>
>> Le 11/06/2012 15:03, Dan Brickley a écrit :
>>> On 11 June 2012 13:48, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>   wrote:
>>>> FYI,
>>>>
>>>> Minutes of the public panel at the Semantic Technology&   Business
>>>> Conference, San Francisco, on 6 June 2012
>>>
>>> They're not so much 'minutes' as informal notes...
>>>
>>> Anyway, see also
>>> http://blog.schema.org/2012/06/semtech-rdfa-microdata-and-more.html
>>> ... I blogged the main things we announced
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>>> On 6/7/2012 9:56 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I moderated a panel on schema.org yesterday at the SemTech
>> conference, and
>>>>> Karen was great because she took minutes! Here they are:
>>>>> https://www.w3.org/2012/06/06-schema-minutes.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
>> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager.
>> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the
>> mailgateway
>> **************************************************
>>
>
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 14:27:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 June 2012 14:27:53 GMT