W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2011

RE : Checking MA mapping examples

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:57:06 +0200
To: Soohong Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>, Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
CC: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D6001115AFEA266@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
By the way, I had missed that you used Protegé.  Although I used protégé in the past, I believe it is not the most appropriate for testing some of the constructs MAWG is using. This is why I moved to TopBraid.

I'll look at what Werner suggested but I am more suspicious than ever though on the results of these tests. Also I am not so sure Protégé is still using Pellet. What version was used? I hope above 4.x

Jean-Pierre


________________________________________
De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Soohong Daniel Park [soohongp@gmail.com]
Date d'envoi : lundi, 5. septembre 2011 18:18
À :  Höffernig, Martin
Cc : tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Objet : Re: Checking MA mapping examples

Good summary Martin, I've added this item into the agenda.

Soohong Daniel Park
Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D
www.soohongp.com<http://www.soohongp.com>, twitter:@natpt

2011. 9. 5. 오후 11:35 Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at<mailto:Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>> 작성:

Dear all,

I have finished checking all mapping examples with Protégé and Pellet.

Here is my list of issues:

-          Missing comment line containing creation and version information (cf. [1])

-          In some cases, datatype values are represented as strings rather than xsd:decimal

-          Sme datatype values  include  units, which should be removed (eg. Kbps)

-          In 3gp-Example-v4.rdf the xml:base directive should be removed in order to import the ma ontology correctly

-          According to Pellet, the EBUCore example is inconsistent. Possible reason is that  at least one instance is a member of two disjoint classes (MediaResource and Collection).

-          Cablelabs 1. 1 example is not RDF valid
I propose to discuss these issues during the upcoming F2F meeting.

[1]: <http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guidelines_for_ontology_examples.html> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guidelines_for_ontology_examples.html


Best,
Martin


--
Martin Höffernig
Audiovisual  Media Group
DIGITAL – Institute for Information and Communication Technologies

JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AUSTRIA

phone:  +43-316-876-1184
general fax: +43-316-876-1191
web:    http://www.joanneum.at/digital

e-mail: martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at<mailto:martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at>


-----------------------------------------
**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it 
are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email 
message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 17:00:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 6 September 2011 17:00:36 GMT