W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Reference YouTube JSON response

From: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:45:44 +0200
Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C50A1D08-5C1F-4E6A-BAC6-8CF5788F2848@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Hi Werner!

Dou you want us to retrieve the current rating value at time of evaluation?

Cheers.
_____________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ

Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062

stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
http://twitter.com/fstegmai
_____________________________

Am 27.10.2011 um 12:12 schrieb Bailer, Werner:

> Florian,
> 
> thanks for the example.
> 
> I think rating should be included, even if it's dynamic. As we are creating a reference JSON file, this should be managed. 
> 
> Concerning genre: it is in German, but language is en-us.
> 
> Best reagrds,
> Werner
> ________________________________________
> Von: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] im Auftrag von Florian Stegmaier [stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2011 11:18
> An: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Reference YouTube JSON response
> 
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> i give my comments inline.
> 
>> About the current JSON file, describing the YouTube video "Supersonic" my feeling is that we should have all the properties mapping to MA ontology
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/PR/#youtube-table
> 
> Yes, this should be the case
> 
>> BtW, here is a bug (missing info) in this table for the "language" property
> 
> Someone should update it.
> 
>> I still have the following issues:
>> 
>> "contributor" and "creator" are not available in the mapping table for YouTube. How come is it "validated" in the implementation ?
> 
> It is the case because i have not yet reflected it to the implementation. I will collect all issues and reflect it at once. Hopefully, there will be more input to this.
> 
>> Why "Genre" and "rating" are listed as "failed"
> 
> Rating is not a static field. it changes every day. A validation against a non-static field does not make real sense for me.
> 
>> Last issue is about the Dublin Core.
>> When trying to validate the Dublin Core, "Validate all Properties", I get a table listing the properties (no validation information).
> 
> You can only use the extension with Youtube and Vimeo (will be removed in the final version).
> 
>> I am probably missing something.
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> thierry.
>> 
>> 
>> Le 27/10/2011 07:45, Florian Stegmaier a écrit :
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> please find attached the current JSON file, describing the YouTube video "Supersonic" [1]. We have to discuss, what is missing in this file to serve as an input for comparison in the test suite.
>>> 
>>> Maybe this could be also discussed at TPAC? (beside the use case for web apps and the browser vendor / schema.org stuff)
>>> 
>>> Cheers.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] http://www.youtube.com/v/p29MG7wn4F8
>>> _____________________________
>>> Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
>>> Chair of Distributed Information Systems
>>> University of Passau
>>> Innstr. 43
>>> 94032 Passau
>>> 
>>> Room 248 ITZ
>>> 
>>> Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
>>> Fax: +49 851 509 3062
>>> 
>>> stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
>>> https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
>>> http://twitter.com/fstegmai
>>> _____________________________
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 10:46:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 27 October 2011 10:46:18 GMT