W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > November 2011

Re: datatypes without xsd namespace information in ma-ont.rdf

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:07:07 +0100
Message-ID: <4ED2C29B.70103@w3.org>
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
CC: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, "'Höffernig, Martin'" <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>

Pierre-Antoine,

thank you for your RDF and TTL files R35.

Now included in the spec at

http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-mediaont-10-20111129/#ont-rdf
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-mediaont-10-20111129/#ont-ttl


Published at

http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf

Best,

thierry



Le 25/11/2011 21:50, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> first of all, my apologies for my silent of the last months; I've been
> literally flooded with lectures -- plus the organization of WWW 2012.
>
> Anyway...
>
> I checked the RDF from the CR and from the PR: apart from the namespace
> problem, they *are* semantically equivalent, so everything is fine on
> that front.
>
> However, I saw that ma:identifier sneaked back, while we had decided to
> remove it as identifiers are bound to be URIs, and so owl:sameAs should
> always be used instead (see [1]).
>
> So I made version R35, which is R34 with ma:identifier removed again.
> I converted it to turtle, and checked that the two versions are valid
> and semantically equivalent. I also made HTML-embedable version of both.
>
> Please find attached the 4 corresponding files.
>
>   best
>
>    pa
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Jun/0100.html
>
> On 11/25/2011 02:22 PM, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
>> As far as I can see R34 corresponds to what I have and sent you earlier today. But the actual RDF and Turtle in the spec was probably generated by PA...
>>
>> It would be better if he could clarify the situation as he probably know better about the genesis of these version as embedded in the spec (and why these differences have shown up)
>>
>> I am happy to help but I don't want to add to the confusion.
>>
>> Jean-Pierre
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>> Sent: vendredi, 25. novembre 2011 14:15
>> To: tmichel@w3.org
>> Cc: Evain, Jean-Pierre; "'Höffernig, Martin'"; public-media-annotation@w3.org; Pierre-Antoine Champin
>> Subject: Re: datatypes without xsd namespace information in ma-ont.rdf
>>
>>
>> Jean Pierre
>> Pierre Antoine,
>>
>>
>> Looking at the former RDF in the CR version
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-mediaont-10-20110707/#ont-owl
>>
>> Looking at the current RDF in the RR version
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-mediaont-10-20111129/#ont-owl
>>
>>
>> both files have the same version number "R34 and same date "2011-04-06"
>> but the files are different.
>>
>> Can you please make sure the PR version is the good one.
>>
>> I would not want to mess the spec with these last minute updates.
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> Le 25/11/2011 14:02, Thierry MICHEL a écrit :
>>> I have published the RDF in the spec at
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-mediaont-10-20111129/#ont-owl
>>>
>>> and at
>>> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
>>>
>>>
>>> Please check and let me know if it is OK.
>>>
>>> If you have the time it would be great to check the Turtle version
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-mediaont-10-20111129/#ont-ttl
>>>
>>> I think it was Pierre Antoine who gave me these two versions (RDF + TURTLE)
>>> This was following an issue about having&lt;&gt; entities in the file,
>>> making it inconvenient for copy and paste from the spec
>>>
>>> Pierre Antoine can you check these before publication ?
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 25/11/2011 13:07, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>>>> Timely indeed...
>>>>
>>>> I just re-validated it on http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ :-)
>>>>
>>>> It's rev 34 like identified in the specification. By the way, I tried
>>>> to validate what is currently in the PR and it doesn't pass the test.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know what happened when.
>>>>
>>>> Apparently the Turtle version is fine but I haven't cross-checked it.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Pierre
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>>>> Sent: vendredi, 25. novembre 2011 12:56
>>>> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
>>>> Cc: "'Höffernig, Martin'"; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>> Subject: Re: datatypes without xsd namespace information in ma-ont.rdf
>>>>
>>>> Jean Pierre could you send me your latest file ?
>>>>
>>>> and I will update the spec before publication.
>>>>
>>>> Thierry
>>>>
>>>> Le 25/11/2011 11:50, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>>>>> It is true for all xml datatypes and the error is in the rdf in the
>>>>> body of the specification.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jean-Pierre
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Evain, Jean-Pierre [mailto:evain@ebu.ch]
>>>>> Sent: vendredi, 25. novembre 2011 11:47
>>>>> To: 'Höffernig, Martin'; tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>>> Subject: RE: datatypes without xsd namespace information in ma-ont.rdf
>>>>>
>>>>> I am looking at the latest version I have kept where datatypes were
>>>>> expressed as follows
>>>>>
>>>>> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal"/>
>>>>>
>>>>> With the namespace defined as
>>>>>
>>>>> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
>>>>>
>>>>> which looks fine to me. I don't know what went wrong and when but you
>>>>> are right the declaration should be there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jean-Pierre
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Höffernig, Martin [mailto:Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at]
>>>>> Sent: vendredi, 25. novembre 2011 09:21
>>>>> To: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>>> Subject: AW: datatypes without xsd namespace information in ma-ont.rdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Thierry, all,
>>>>>
>>>>> since I have no permission to access the w3 cvs repository, I can't
>>>>> retrieve previous versions of the RDF/XML version of the MA ontology.
>>>>> However, I explain in more detail what is missing in the current
>>>>> version.
>>>>>
>>>>> current version (Turtle serialization)
>>>>> :frameRate a owl:DatatypeProperty;
>>>>> rdfs:comment "Corresponds to 'frameRate' in the Ontology for Media
>>>>> Resources, in frame per second.";
>>>>> rdfs:domain :MediaResource;
>>>>> rdfs:range xsd:decimal .
>>>>>
>>>>> current version (RDF/XML serialization)
>>>>> <owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:about="#frameRate">
>>>>> <rdfs:comment>Corresponds to 'frameRate' in the Ontology for Media
>>>>> Resources, in frame per second.</rdfs:comment>
>>>>> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#MediaResource"/>
>>>>> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="decimal"/>
>>>>> </owl:DatatypeProperty>
>>>>>
>>>>> Above, there are the definitions of ma:frameRate expressed by RDF/XML
>>>>> and Turtle. In RDF/XML version, no namespace information for the
>>>>> range datatype (decimal) is attached explicitly, whereas in the
>>>>> Turtle version, the XSD namespace is attached correctly.
>>>>> In a previous version RDF/XML version (the one I used to validate the
>>>>> example files at the F4F meeting in Graz last September), the missing
>>>>> XSD namespace information was present:
>>>>> previous version (RDF/XML serialization)
>>>>> <owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:about="#frameRate">
>>>>> <rdfs:comment>Corresponds to 'frameRate' in the Ontology for Media
>>>>> Resources, in frame per second.</rdfs:comment>
>>>>> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#MediaResource"/>
>>>>> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&xsd;decimal"/>
>>>>> </owl:DatatypeProperty>
>>>>>
>>>>> This missing XSD namespace issue applies to all XSD-related datatypes
>>>>> (decimal, date, integer, ...) in the current RDF/XML version of the
>>>>> MA ontology.
>>>>> Again, since I haven't read/write access to the current MA versions,
>>>>> someone else should address this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>>> Von: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 15:29
>>>>>> An: Höffernig, Martin
>>>>>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>>>> Betreff: Re: datatypes without xsd namespace information in ma-ont.rdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi martin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You may want to see the diffs using cvslog
>>>>>> https://cvs.w3.org/Team/WWW/ns/ma-ont.rdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There you can "select for diffs" from one previous version to the
>>>>>> latest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> let me know what is missing, that was in a orevious version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thierry
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 22/11/2011 12:18, Höffernig, Martin a écrit :
>>>>>>> Dear Thierry, all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just found out that in the current RDF/XML serialization of the ma
>>>>>> ontology [1] the xsd namespace information for all xsd datatypes is
>>>>>> missing. These xsd datatypes are used to designate the range for
>>>>>> several ma properties.
>>>>>>> However, in the Turtle version [2], the xsd namespace is attached to
>>>>>> the related xsd datatypes correctly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can anyone confirm my observation?
>>>>>>> I'm quite sure that the missing xsd information was present in former
>>>>>> versions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
>>>>>>> [2]: http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Martin Höffernig
>>>>>>> Audiovisual Media Group
>>>>>>> DIGITAL - Institute for Information and Communication Technologies
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, 8010
>>>>>>> Graz, AUSTRIA
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> phone: +43-316-876-1184
>>>>>>> general fax: +43-316-876-1191
>>>>>>> web: http://www.joanneum.at/digital
>>>>>>> e-mail:
>>>>>>> martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at<mailto:martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----------------------------------------
>>>>> **************************************************
>>>>> This email and any files transmitted with it
>>>>> are confidential and intended solely for the
>>>>> use of the individual or entity to whom they
>>>>> are addressed.
>>>>> If you have received this email in error,
>>>>> please notify the system manager.
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this email
>>>>> message has been swept by the mailgateway
>>>>> **************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
Received on Sunday, 27 November 2011 23:07:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 27 November 2011 23:07:20 GMT