W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Decision needed before exit LC

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:52:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4DD4F67D.9050300@w3.org>
To: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
CC: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>


Le 19/05/2011 12:20, Joakim Söderberg a écrit :
> Issue (1) is then resolved! Can somebody please take an action to update the table in section 7?

I have done it.
Thierry.



>
> /joakim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre-Antoine Champin [mailto:pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr]
> Sent: den 18 maj 2011 16:58
> To: Joakim Söderberg
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Decision needed before exit LC
>
> On 05/17/2011 01:46 PM, Joakim Söderberg wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Next week we want to vote on moving the Ontology doc to CR. For this reason we need to decide upon the following:
>>
>> 1) Relaxing ma:relation, Protagonist: Martin Höffernig
>>
>> Decide whether to:
>> 	i) Relax the constraint on ma:isRelatedTo, not restricted only to media resources.
>> 	or
>> 	ii) use rdfs:seeAlso to link associated documents
>
> as pointed out by Werner, ma:isRelatedTo is clearly not meant to be limited to point to media resources in the example of section 6, so that constraint was a bug introduced in the RDF ontology.
>
> (I'm excluding the option to rewrite section 6 now... :)
>
> I'm attaching the new XML/RDF and TTL ontologies.
>
> Note also that I therefore renamed ma:isRelatedTo to ma:hasRelatedResource, in order to be consistent in our naming scheme.
>
> This must be reflected in the correspondence table of section 7.
>
> This may also have an impact on the example RDF files produced by others. Apologies about that...
>
>> 2)  Should we change all datatypes for literal and provide definitions for the formats: according to Jean Pierre ?
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011May/00
>> 32.html
>
> I already replied to Jean-Pierre about that (I disagreed). Is anyone esle pushing that proposal?
>
> However, the attached version follows Jean-Pierre's proposal to simplify some of the domain/range constraints (e.g. frame size) to make the ontology more flexible.
>
>    pa
>
>>
>> 3) Binary metadata formats, Protagonist: Silvia
>> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011May/0
>> 075.html )
>>
>> i)	for OGG example, she can't provide *all* the properties mapping to the properties core set
>>
>> ii)	The format been binary formats she can't create an RDF file.
>>
>> This conflicts with our exit criteria. Should we change those or is Sylvia missing something ?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> /Joakim
>
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 10:52:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 May 2011 10:58:07 GMT