W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2011-05-17

From: Tobias Bürger <tobias@tobiasbuerger.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:40:01 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTikuwRK=3vtafPUb__+FvUrCzUVmEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tmichel@w3.org
Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
Hi Thierry,

could you please add the issue with METS and Media RDF Vocabulary on the
agenda?

Thanks!

Best regards,

Tobias

2011/5/16 Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>

> Hi,
> Here is the agenda for next call.
>
> All,
>
> Joakim  ask me to send this agenda, but he will chair
> again this meeting tomorrow.
>
> /Thierry
>
> -------------------------------
>
> 1. Convene
> Media Annotations WG
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") Alternative dial
> numbers:
> France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03
> UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152
> IRC channel: #mediaann
>
> Tuesday 2011-05-10
> 11:00-12:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm *13:00*)
>
> Regrets:  Daniel, Thierry
> Chair: Joakim,
> Scribe: volunteer?
>
> Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2011/05/17-mediaann-minutes.html
>
> 2. Next meeting
> 2011/05/24
>
> 3. Items
> [A] Action items:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
>
>
> ------------------
>
>
> [B] Follow up on the discussion in HTML5 about metadata access
>
> Joakim and Sylvia agree that if the HTML WG  can not conceive a specific
> uses cases, we should not pursue this.
>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011May/0068.html
>
> I have invited Sylvia to join this telecon, but she can't join.
>
> [C] [Reminder] editors of the Metadata examples to send their files
> Silvia seems to say
>
> 1- for OGG example, she can not provide *all* the properties mapping
> to the properties core set
>
> 2- for OGG example. The format been binary formats she can not create an
> RDF file.
>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011May/0075.html
>
>
> This conflicts with our exit criteria.
> Should we change those or is Sylvia missing something ?
>
> Editors: Reminder; Please send in your format example
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Format_mapping_review
>
>
>
> [D] Ontology document.
>
> Latest version for CR now available for review.
> With some new edits on following new comments.
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
>
> 1- relaxing the constraint on ma:isRelatedTo,
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011May/0082.html
>
>
> é- Should we also change all datatypes for literal and provide definitions
> for the formats: according to Jean Pierre ?
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011May/0032.html
>
> Next week we should probably vote to move the Ontology to CR.
> Therefore review the document and please attend next week telecon.
>
>
> [E] Revision of the API document.
>
> Florian updates ?
>
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html
>
>
>
>
> 4. AOB
>
>
> /Thierry
>
>


-- 
___________________________________
Dr. Tobias Bürger
http://www.tobiasbuerger.com
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 15:40:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 May 2011 15:40:30 GMT