W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [Reminder] editors of the Metadata examples to send their files

From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:51:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4DD13A09.4020508@liris.cnrs.fr>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
On 05/16/2011 03:34 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>> Hi Sylvia
>>
>> Providing an RDF file was decided back at the MAWG F2F in Lyon.
>> And it is mentioned in our exit Criteria for CR.
>>
>> Therefore if providing an RDF file is not possible for OGG we should etheir
>> change our exit criterie, else formats not providing an RDF would be removed
>> from the spec.
> 
> It is possible. I can throw an RDF together to list all the fields
> available. I just don't think it makes much sense for metadata that is
> encapsulated in a binary file. And this includes other formats such as
> QuickTime, too.

Silvia,

the purpose of the RDF file is precisely to convey, in a uniform way,
the metadata encapsulated in the original format(s).

I don't see how the fact that the original format is binary or not makes
it more or less relevant...

  pa
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 14:52:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 May 2011 14:52:18 GMT