W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [Reminder] editors of the Metadata examples to send their files

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:26:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4DD0EDC6.4040705@w3.org>
To: tobias@tobiasbuerger.com, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Tobias,

Thanks for the LOM examples.

Now added at
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Format_mapping_review

Now for the METS, we may keep it in even if their is very poor overlap 
to our Media Resource ontology.

But for the Media RDF we should probably remove it (latter when going to 
PR).

Meanwhile I have put these two formats "at risk" in the "Status of this 
document" section, see
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html


Joakim, could you discuss this during the Telecon tomorrow. I am 
currently at the AC meeting in Bilbao, and it might be difficult for me 
to join tomorrow.

Best,

thierry
 >

Le 16/05/2011 08:22, Tobias Bürger a écrit :
> Hi Thierry,
>
> please find attached myexample file for LOM. My EXIF example will come
> tonight or tomorrow.
>
> I would like to ask you to put two points on the agenda for the call
> tomorrow:
>
> (1) Descoping of METS?
>
> ->  Reason: I wanted to make a METS example file as well, but realized that
> the overlap to our Media Resource ontology is actually very minor; in fact
> only the descriptive elements overlap. Therfore I asked myself if it makes
> sense to keep the METS mapping in our spec? Maybe you can ask tomorrow in
> the telcon in the round. If I can not join, I would vote for descope
>
> (2) How to treat Media RDF?
>
> ->  Reason: I also wanted to make a MediaRDF example file but realized that
> the link pointing to the spec from the Media Resource document is no longer
> valid. Moreover you can not find any further source of information about the
> MediaRDF vocabulary on the Web. It seems that the vocabulary is no longer
> available /supported. Therefore I am not sure how we should treat it? Could
> you also discuss this in the telecon tomorrow?
>
> Thank you&  best regards!
>
> Tobias
>
>
>
> 2011/5/4 Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>
>
>> All,
>>
>> This is a reminder for the editors of the Metadata examples to send their
>> files (XML and RDF).
>>
>> We are now close to move the Media Ontology document to Candidate Rec (CR)
>> In order to exit CR, we must deliver a set of testcases for each format. So
>> far we have a fair amount of files.
>>
>> But we are still missing the following:
>>
>> QuickTime        Courtney
>> 3GP              Courtney
>> MP4              Courtney
>>
>> XMP              Felix
>>
>> EBUCore          Jean-Pierre
>>
>> MediaRDF Vocabulary Tobias
>> LOM v1484-12-1      Tobias
>> METS v1.7           Tobias
>>
>> OGG              Sylvia
>> WEBM             Silvia
>>
>> Dublin Core     Thierry
>> Flash           Thierry
>>
>> SMPTE RP210-11   Werner
>> TTML             Werner
>>
>> Media RSS v1.1.2 Wonsuk
>> TXFeed v0.9      Wonsuk
>>
>>
>> Deadline for sending these file was set to end of May 2011.
>>
>> Per W3C process, all format missing these files will have to be removed
>> from the Media Ontology specification in order to allow moving forward to
>> PR.
>> Therefore please send your files ASAP.
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 09:26:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 May 2011 09:26:47 GMT