Say, on that page, there is a excel spreadsheet that contains all the formats on different tabs. Is it on purpose that neither Ogg nor WebM are there? Silvia. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > Silvia, > > You may want to check the files already provided. > > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Format_mapping_review > > Thierry. > > Le 04/05/2011 12:09, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >> >> Are there example files to do these? >> Silvia. > >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 04/05/2011, at 7:05 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> This is a reminder for the editors of the Metadata examples to send their >>> files (XML and RDF). >>> >>> We are now close to move the Media Ontology document to Candidate Rec >>> (CR) >>> In order to exit CR, we must deliver a set of testcases for each format. >>> So far we have a fair amount of files. >>> >>> But we are still missing the following: >>> >>> QuickTime Courtney >>> 3GP Courtney >>> MP4 Courtney >>> >>> XMP Felix >>> >>> EBUCore Jean-Pierre >>> >>> MediaRDF Vocabulary Tobias >>> LOM v1484-12-1 Tobias >>> METS v1.7 Tobias >>> >>> OGG Sylvia >>> WEBM Silvia >>> >>> Dublin Core Thierry >>> Flash Thierry >>> >>> SMPTE RP210-11 Werner >>> TTML Werner >>> >>> Media RSS v1.1.2 Wonsuk >>> TXFeed v0.9 Wonsuk >>> >>> >>> Deadline for sending these file was set to end of May 2011. >>> >>> Per W3C process, all format missing these files will have to be removed >>> from the Media Ontology specification in order to allow moving forward to >>> PR. >>> Therefore please send your files ASAP. >>> >>> Thierry >Received on Sunday, 8 May 2011 12:49:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 8 May 2011 12:49:56 GMT