W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

AW: AW: Update of the Ontology Doc according to Werner and Pierre Antoine suggestions

From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:39:24 +0200
To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>
CC: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09FA94DE17918@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
Thanks, Thierry.

In my opinion ok.

Best regards,
Werner

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 04. Mai 2011 15:39
> An: Bailer, Werner
> Cc: Florian Stegmaier; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Update of the Ontology Doc according to Werner and
> Pierre Antoine suggestions
> 
> 
> 
> Le 04/05/2011 11:05, Bailer, Werner a écrit :
> > Hi Thierry,
> >
> > thanks for the changes. They should also be reflected in the type
> definitions:
> >
> > targetAudience:
> > change
> > { (attName="audience", attValue="URI" | "String"),
> (attName="classificationSystem", attValue="URI" | "String") }
> > to
> > { (attName="audience", attValue="URI" | "String"),
> (attName="classificationSystem", attValue="URI" | "String")? }
> 
> 
> Right I had forgot to update this. Now Done
> >
> > For location, this would get quite complex with the syntax we have,
> as we would need to enumerate (name) | (lat,long) | (name,lat,long) or
> if we should just be more clear in the text, stating that at least name
> or (lat, long) needs to be present.
> 
> Updated to:
> A tuple identifying a name or a set of geographic coordinates, in a
> given system, that describe where the resource has been created,
> developed, recorded, or otherwise authored. The name can be defined
> using either a URI (recommended best practice) or plain text. The
> geographic coordinates include longitude, latitude and an optional
> altitude information, in a given geo-coordinate system (such as the
> World Geodetic System) that MAY also be specified. At least a name or
> (longitude, latitude) must be provided.
> 
> Let me know if that is OK.
> 
> Best regards,
> Thierry
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > Von: Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 04. Mai 2011 10:41
> > An: Bailer, Werner; Florian Stegmaier; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > Betreff: Update of  the Ontology Doc according to Werner and Pierre
> Antoine suggestions
> >
> > Werner, Florian,
> >
> >
> > Per my ACTION-407 I have updated the Ontology Doc according to Werner
> > and Pierre Antoine suggestions.[1]
> >
> > The Ontology now says:
> > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-
> 1.0.html#core-property-examples
> >
> > location:
> > A tuple identifying a name or a set of geographic coordinates, in a
> > given system, that describe where the resource has been created,
> > developed, recorded, or otherwise authored. The name can be defined
> > using either a URI (recommended best practice) or plain text. The
> > geographic coordinates include longitude, latitude, and an optional
> > altitude information, in a given geo-coordinate system (such as the
> > World Geodetic System) that MAY also be specified.
> >
> >
> > targetAudience:
> > A tuple identifying the audience being addressed (demographic class,
> > parental guidance group, or geographical region) and an optional
> > classification system (e.g., a parental guidance issuing agency).
> >
> >
> > Please review and let me know that this is OK.
> >
> > Florian, could you please update the API doc according to [1](I guess
> > this is already done
> >
> > [1]
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
> annotation/2011Apr/0021.html
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Thierry.
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 13:39:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 4 May 2011 13:42:07 GMT