RE: datatype properties' range

This is the file with the changes on date to dateTime and string to literal, validated RL using the Manchester OWL-2 validator.

I had to manually remove a xsd:date declaration that Protégé 4.1 adds automatically although we are only using xsd:dateTime. Unless this comes from the comment, which is using dc:date.

Jean-Pierre



-----Original Message-----
From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evain, Jean-Pierre
Sent: jeudi, 10. mars 2011 09:55
To: 'Pierre-Antoine Champin'; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: datatype properties' range

Fine although that is regrettable in a sense. 

In the EBU schemas we tend to clearly separate the date and time to avoid syntax mistakes when writing dates or times only.

Jean-Pierre

-----Original Message-----
From: Pierre-Antoine Champin [mailto:pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr] 
Sent: jeudi, 10. mars 2011 09:40
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: datatype properties' range

On 03/09/2011 07:17 PM, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
> There would also likely be a need to check compliance with OWL-RL or
> another profile, if we care?

Mentionning OWL-RL conformance...
I notice that we are using a deprecated datatype, namely xsd:date .

This datatype is not recognized by any OWL2 profile, and is not included 
in XMLSchema 1.1 (which is the reference for OWL2).

I suggest that we move (back?) to xsd:datetime, for the sake of 
conformance (because I think that yes, we care).

   pa

-----------------------------------------
**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it 
are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email 
message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************