Re: datatype properties' range

On 03/09/2011 07:17 PM, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
> There would also likely be a need to check compliance with OWL-RL or
> another profile, if we care?

Mentionning OWL-RL conformance...
I notice that we are using a deprecated datatype, namely xsd:date .

This datatype is not recognized by any OWL2 profile, and is not included 
in XMLSchema 1.1 (which is the reference for OWL2).

I suggest that we move (back?) to xsd:datetime, for the sake of 
conformance (because I think that yes, we care).

   pa

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 08:40:40 UTC