W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

RE: Checked metadata examples and RDF files

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:49:50 +0200
To: "'tmichel@w3.org'" <tmichel@w3.org>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010F5A2737A5@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
No, in your mail you are only mentioning files marked in green ;-(

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] 
Sent: vendredi, 17. juin 2011 13:49
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: Checked metadata examples and RDF files

IS this a daltonian joke ?

Your files are indeed all green except the XML IPTC_Example which is an 
empty file).

Le 17/06/2011 13:41, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> All marked in green ;-) is one greener than the other?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
> Sent: vendredi, 17. juin 2011 11:55
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Checked metadata examples and RDF files
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have check the multimedia metadata formats from the testsuite
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>
> Status:
>
> - Files marked in green are validated (RDF validated or XML well formed)
> - Files marked in green are not valid (RDF valid or XML not well formed)
> - Files marked in green can not be validated (binary files for example)
>
>
> Missing Files
> *************
>
> We are still missing the following RDF files
> MRSS
> TXF
> Flash
>
> RDF Files invalid
> *****************
> EXIF_RDF
> QT_RDF
> 3GP_RDF
> MP4_RDF
>
>
> XML Files invalid
> *****************
> Cablelabbs ADI 1.1 Example
> IPTC_Example (empty file) please resend JP.
> TXF_Example
>
> TTL Files invalid
> ******************
> EXIF_TTL
> QT_TTL
> 3GP_TTL
> MP4_TTL
>
>
> Please send me your validated files.
>
>
>
>
> Note that the above only checks the syntax of the documents but not the
> completeness of the properties.
>
> We will have to manually check these file and probably assign reviewers.
>
> Thierry.
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error,
> please notify the system manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email
> message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 11:50:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:42 UTC