W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

Re: RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:07:15 +0200
Message-ID: <4DFAFD23.5020603@w3.org>
To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
They are OK.

Le 16/06/2011 00:30, Evain, Jean-Pierre a Úcrit :
> can you open the files or do they also look empty to you?
>
> ________________________________________
> De : Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Date d'envoi : jeudi, 16. juin 2011 00:28
> └ : Evain, Jean-Pierre; tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid
>
> ?????????????????????
>
> ________________________________________
> De : Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Date d'envoi : jeudi, 16. juin 2011 00:23
> └ : Evain, Jean-Pierre; tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid
>
> getting late ...
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> De : Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Date d'envoi : jeudi, 16. juin 2011 00:10
> └ : Evain, Jean-Pierre; tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid
>
> Sorry Thierry, the Manchester validator validated it but I used another tool, which found an extra error.
>
> Use this one please.
>
> JP
>
> ________________________________________
> De : Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Date d'envoi : mercredi, 15. juin 2011 23:53
> └ : Evain, Jean-Pierre; tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid
>
> EBUCore, jp
>
> ________________________________________
> De : Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Date d'envoi : mercredi, 15. juin 2011 22:26
> └ : Evain, Jean-Pierre; tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid
>
> Thierry,
>
> this is an updated version of the EBUNML2/IPTC RDF file.
>
> This one validate also on the IRI format used.
>
> The EBUCore RDF file will follow.
>
> Regards, Jean-Pierre
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Evain, Jean-Pierre [evain@ebu.ch]
> Date d'envoi : mercredi, 15. juin 2011 19:29
> └ : tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid
>
> I'll further fake some of the IRI and provide two new files for EBUCore and EBUNML2/IPTC.
>
> I have been using three different applications to generate these files... There is really an issue with RDF/OWL validation. Wider adoption will require this being worked out, really.
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
> http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ARPServlet
>
> EBUCoreXML_2_MaOntRDF_ITM528229.owl: Your RDF document validated successfully
>
> EBUNML2XML_2_MaOntRDF_v10_ITM528228.owl: Your RDF document validated successfully
>
> TVAXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22.owl: Your RDF document validated successfully
>
> http://www.rdfabout.com/demo/validator/validate.xpd
>
> EBUCoreXML_2_MaOntRDF_ITM528229.owl: Problem with some URI formats
>
> EBUNML2XML_2_MaOntRDF_v10_ITM528228.owl: Problem with some URI formats
>
> TVAXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22.owl: Syntax validated OK
>
>
> http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator
>
> EBUCoreXML_2_MaOntRDF_ITM528229.owl: OWL FULL YES
>
> EBUNML2XML_2_MaOntRDF_v10_ITM528228.owl: OWL FULL YES
>
> TVAXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22.owl: OWL FULL YES
>
> http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/validator/validate
>
> EBUCoreXML_2_MaOntRDF_ITM528229.owl: Problem of non absolute IRI
>
> EBUNML2XML_2_MaOntRDF_v10_ITM528228.owl: Problem of non absolute IRI
>
> TVAXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22.owl: The ontology and all of its imports are in the OWL 2 profile
>
> ________________________________________
> De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
> Date d'envoi : mercredi, 15. juin 2011 18:49
> └ : public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : Metadata formats examples must be valid
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media
> Resources 1.0
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>
> I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the
> associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties.
>
> Here are my remarks:
>
> 1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML
> validation (well formed document)[1].
> -->  XML documents MUST be well formed.
>
> 2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2]
> -->  RDF documents MUST be valid
>
> 3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong:
> <rdf:Description rdf:about= ....
> or
> xml:base="...
> etc.
>
> -->  Please make sure the corresponding URL are right.
>
>
> Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements
> are fulfilled.
>
> We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in
> ERCIM/Sophia. Therefore please provide valid documents before this event
> 28/29 june.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry.
> -----------------------------------------
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error,
> please notify the system manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email
> message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 07:09:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:42 UTC