W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

Re: RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:38:50 +0200
Message-ID: <4DFAF67A.3010009@w3.org>
To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Jean-Pierre,

I am doing it right now ...
And yes you were faster ;-)

T.

Le 17/06/2011 08:17, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> Thierry,
>
> Have you published mine too. I was even faster ;-))
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
> ________________________________________
> De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
> Date d'envoi : vendredi, 17. juin 2011 08:14
> À : Silvia Pfeiffer
> Cc : public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : Re: Metadata formats examples must be valid
>
> Silvia,
>
> Thankyou for your fast feedback.
>
> Files now published at.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>
> Best,
>
> thierry.
>
> Le 17/06/2011 05:20, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> attached validating rdf files on [1].
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Silvia.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>   wrote:
>>> Silvia,
>>>
>>> Sorry I indeed forgot to add the references in my earlier email, but I am
>>> sure you know about the W3C validator ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
>>>
>>> [2] http://validator.w3.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> Please run your files against these validator, it will inform what needs to
>>> be updated if necessary.
>>>
>>> I rather not make these changes myself, and prefer the editors to work on
>>> their files.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 16/06/2011 03:16, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Thierry,
>>>>
>>>> You didn't provide your links for [1] and [2]. And you didn't list the
>>>> documents that are invalid.
>>>>
>>>> Can you please provide additional information so we know what has to be
>>>> changed?
>>>>
>>>> Alternatively, it's of course completely ok for you to make those
>>>> changes yourself in the spirit of keeping the various contributions in
>>>> sync.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Silvia.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>     wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media
>>>>> Resources 1.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the
>>>>> associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are my remarks:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML
>>>>> validation (well formed document)[1].
>>>>> -->     XML documents MUST be well formed.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2]
>>>>> -->     RDF documents MUST be valid
>>>>>
>>>>> 3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong:
>>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about= ....
>>>>> or
>>>>> xml:base="...
>>>>> etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> -->     Please make sure the corresponding URL are right.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements
>>>>> are
>>>>> fulfilled.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in
>>>>> ERCIM/Sophia.
>>>>> Therefore please provide valid documents before this event 28/29 june.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thierry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> -----------------------------------------
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error,
> please notify the system manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email
> message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 06:41:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:42 UTC