W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:17:03 +0200
To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010F5A1BC482@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
Thierry,

Have you published mine too. I was even faster ;-))

Jean-Pierre

________________________________________
De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
Date d'envoi : vendredi, 17. juin 2011 08:14
À : Silvia Pfeiffer
Cc : public-media-annotation@w3.org
Objet : Re: Metadata formats examples must be valid

Silvia,

Thankyou for your fast feedback.

Files now published at.

http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html


Best,

thierry.

Le 17/06/2011 05:20, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
> Hi Thierry,
>
> attached validating rdf files on [1].
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>  wrote:
>> Silvia,
>>
>> Sorry I indeed forgot to add the references in my earlier email, but I am
>> sure you know about the W3C validator ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/

>>
>> [2] http://validator.w3.org/

>>
>>
>> Please run your files against these validator, it will inform what needs to
>> be updated if necessary.
>>
>> I rather not make these changes myself, and prefer the editors to work on
>> their files.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 16/06/2011 03:16, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>>>
>>> Thierry,
>>>
>>> You didn't provide your links for [1] and [2]. And you didn't list the
>>> documents that are invalid.
>>>
>>> Can you please provide additional information so we know what has to be
>>> changed?
>>>
>>> Alternatively, it's of course completely ok for you to make those
>>> changes yourself in the spirit of keeping the various contributions in
>>> sync.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Silvia.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media
>>>> Resources 1.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html

>>>>
>>>> I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the
>>>> associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties.
>>>>
>>>> Here are my remarks:
>>>>
>>>> 1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML
>>>> validation (well formed document)[1].
>>>> -->    XML documents MUST be well formed.
>>>>
>>>> 2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2]
>>>> -->    RDF documents MUST be valid
>>>>
>>>> 3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong:
>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about= ....
>>>> or
>>>> xml:base="...
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>>> -->    Please make sure the corresponding URL are right.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements
>>>> are
>>>> fulfilled.
>>>>
>>>> We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in
>>>> ERCIM/Sophia.
>>>> Therefore please provide valid documents before this event 28/29 june.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Thierry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
-----------------------------------------
**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it 
are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email 
message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 06:18:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:42 UTC