W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Metadata formats examples must be valid

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:14:42 +0200
Message-ID: <4DFAF0D2.9090401@w3.org>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Silvia,

Thankyou for your fast feedback.

Files now published at.

http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html

Best,

thierry.

Le 17/06/2011 05:20, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
> Hi Thierry,
>
> attached validating rdf files on [1].
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>  wrote:
>> Silvia,
>>
>> Sorry I indeed forgot to add the references in my earlier email, but I am
>> sure you know about the W3C validator ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
>>
>> [2] http://validator.w3.org/
>>
>>
>> Please run your files against these validator, it will inform what needs to
>> be updated if necessary.
>>
>> I rather not make these changes myself, and prefer the editors to work on
>> their files.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 16/06/2011 03:16, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>>>
>>> Thierry,
>>>
>>> You didn't provide your links for [1] and [2]. And you didn't list the
>>> documents that are invalid.
>>>
>>> Can you please provide additional information so we know what has to be
>>> changed?
>>>
>>> Alternatively, it's of course completely ok for you to make those
>>> changes yourself in the spirit of keeping the various contributions in
>>> sync.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Silvia.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media
>>>> Resources 1.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>>>>
>>>> I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the
>>>> associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties.
>>>>
>>>> Here are my remarks:
>>>>
>>>> 1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML
>>>> validation (well formed document)[1].
>>>> -->    XML documents MUST be well formed.
>>>>
>>>> 2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2]
>>>> -->    RDF documents MUST be valid
>>>>
>>>> 3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong:
>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about= ....
>>>> or
>>>> xml:base="...
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>>> -->    Please make sure the corresponding URL are right.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements
>>>> are
>>>> fulfilled.
>>>>
>>>> We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in
>>>> ERCIM/Sophia.
>>>> Therefore please provide valid documents before this event 28/29 june.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Thierry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 06:14:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:42 UTC