W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Review of PR version of ontology document

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:12:04 +0100
Message-ID: <4EFC4B04.3070900@w3.org>
To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com, Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Werner,

I am awaiting updated files from Wonsuk and Sylvia for the following 
issues:


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Dec/0007.html


following TVA issue should be fixed as I have published the files
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Dec/0006.html


following WebM issue should be fixed as I have published the files
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Dec/0008.html

We are indedd missing  Turtle versions for iptc, yt, and flv.
but the turtle versions are not mandatory to provide in the test suite, 
as it says:

"The testsuite may also provide an associated Turtle (Terse RDF Triple 
Language) [Turtle] file for convenience."


2) In some Turtle examples the ontology import assertion is not correct 
(due to a transformation issue from RDF/XML).
For example in the DIG35 example [2],  the import assertion looks like 
follows:
<file:/C:/Users/chpoppe.ELIS/Desktop/DIG35_example.rdf>
       a       owl:Ontology ;
       owl:imports <http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont> .

However, since the current Turtle file is now located on the W3C server 
and the reference to Chris' s is not valid anymore, the subject of the 
import statement has to be correct.
I propose to use a bank node serving as subject instead.
For example:
[]   a       owl:Ontology ;
       owl:imports <http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont> .


--> This still needs to be addressed.

3) The mapping table for WebM should be revised or the WebM example 
should be adjusted. For example, property language is marked as RDF 
tested, but there is no language information in the current example. The 
same applies to  property locator. On the other hand, location is 
included in the example but marked as NA. Property copyright is included 
in the example but there is no mapping information in the mapping table.
Maybe more issues on that can be found.


Sylvia:

1- in the webM mapping table of the ontology spec
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html#webm-table

should I change for the property language currently marked in the "RDF 
tested" column as "yes" to "no" ? as there is no language information in 
the current webM example.

2- should I change the property locator currently marked as RDF tested 
in the testsuite? from "yes" to "no" ? as there is no locator 
information in the current webM example.

3- what should we do with the location and copyright properties.
these are provided in the WebM example

<ma:copyright>CC-BY-SA</ma:copyright>
<ma:locationName>Sydney, Australia</ma:locationName>

But in the webM mapping table of the ontology spec
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/REC/#webm-table

- copyrights is not mentioned ( it should be there ?)
- location is listed so that is OK


And in the webM  mapping table of the testsuite
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html#webm-table


- copyrights is not mentioned ( it should be there ?)
- location is  mentioned with "No" in the "RDF tested" column: should 
probably be "yes"

Please let me know what to update for your file.

Best,

Thierry



>
> 2. Issues in the test suite
>
> There are a few issues with the test suite files (e.g. RDF/XML was updated, but Turtle version of the same file is outdated or missing). Martin has reported these issues in the following mails to the group:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Dec/0032.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Dec/0008.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Dec/0007.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Dec/0006.html
>
> For many of these issues, fixed version of the mentioned files have already been posted to the list.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin and Werner
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Werner Bailer
>    Audiovisual Media Group
>
>    DIGITAL - Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
>
>    JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>    Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
>
>    phone:  +43-316-876-1218            personal fax: +43-316-876-91218
>    mobile: +43-699-1876-1218            general fax: +43-316-876-1191
>    web:    http://www.joanneum.at/digital
>    e-mail: mailto:werner.bailer@joanneum.at
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2011 11:12:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 December 2011 11:12:28 GMT