W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2010

Re: review the 6 LC comments pending

From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:15:09 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimeqnOeto5vMhFDN-gP5qSLiXb1fxAgpB2zoLv8@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Chris.Poppe" <Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
Cc: tmichel <tmichel@w3.org>, public-media-annotation <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
2010/9/27 Chris Poppe <Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>

> Dear all,
>
> My comments on the answers to the LC comments :)
> My main concern is what is the goal of these answers? Is it to state what
> has changed or what will (potentially) be changed. As you will see in my
> comments below, most of the answers are not reflected yet in the documents.
>
>
> Ontology
> 2389:  change "are a possible." to "are possible.".
> 2393:  Section "1.2.2 Multimedia container formats in scope" and section
> "5.2.3 Multimedia container formats mapping tables" in the ontology
> document
> are not complete (missing examples and mappings respectively).  It does not
> seem a good idea to me to have empty mapping tables in the document.
> 2398: ok
> 2403: I would extend the example in the ontology document, now the title
> sais: "How to use the POWDER protocol for publishing descriptions of media
> resources". Maybe it's better to say: "How to use the POWDER protocol for
> publishing descriptions of multiple media resources.".
> Also, this example depends on the RDF version of our ontology so we should
> add a descriptive introduction to the example.
> 2404: change "ontlogy" to "ontology". I find the answer confusing, will the
> RDF appendix be part of this ontology document or not?  BTW, the
> RDF-version
> has no identifiers for the different classes and properties!
> 2405: I guess the answer should say: "we changed this" and not "we will
> change this".
>  Also it sais: "A paragraph will be added that specifies the purpose of the
> specification and its scope: the property list, its RDF implementation and
> the set of mappings.". Where is this paragraph?
> The changes to the mapping table are not done.
> It sais: "and will have to correct this in the last place where the
> confusion unfortunately still figures in the document.". Where is this in
> the document?
> 2411: The example of broadcast date still has to be added.
> 2417: The answer is done, but the changes have not been done yet.
> 2418 :  The answer sais: " We agreed with your editorial comments and will
> implement them in the coming weeks."  Now I am confused about the goal of
> the answers to the LC comments (in general), is it to state what we will
> change or is it to state that we did change something according to the
> request?
> The XPATH expressions still need to be changed.
>


Yes, I will work on that this afternoon, after the call.

Felix



>
> API:
> 2394: This answer has a "TODO" in it.
> 2395: The statement about exceptions has not been added yet.
> 2406: ok.
> 2410: ok.
> 2419: This answer has "TODO's" in it.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry
> MICHEL
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:03 PM
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: review the 6 LC comments pending
>
> All MAWG participants,
>
>
> We have currently 6 LC comments for which we have a drafted "Proposed
> Resolution" [status="pending"]
>
> Please review these 6 comment responses and send feedback to the MAWG
> mailing if needed.
> If there are no issue raised by the next telecon meeting next tuesday on
> these responses to comments, we will consider those as *resolved by the
> MAWG* [status="resolved-yes"]
>
> LC Comments to review:
>
> 1-List of comments on "Ontology for Media Resource 1.0:
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/
> 2389:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/
> 2393:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/
> 2417:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/
> 2404:
>
> 2-List of comments on "Ontology for API Resource 1.0:
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-2010
> 0608/2395<http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-2010%0A0608/2395>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-2010
> 0608/2410?cid=2410<http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-2010%0A0608/2410?cid=2410>
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry.
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 08:15:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 September 2010 08:15:47 GMT