W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2010

Re: review the 6 LC comments pending

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:47:33 +0200
Message-ID: <4CA09265.4050004@w3.org>
To: Chris.Poppe@UGent.be
CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Chris,

The goal of these answers it to get an agreement with the commenter, to 
enable to move the spec to CR.

In parallel to those LC comment answers, we should reflect the changes 
into the spec.

This will allow commenter to see what is exactly our proposal.

Thierry.




Le 27/09/2010 12:04, Chris Poppe a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> My comments on the answers to the LC comments :)
> My main concern is what is the goal of these answers? Is it to state what
> has changed or what will (potentially) be changed. As you will see in my
> comments below, most of the answers are not reflected yet in the documents.
>
>
> Ontology
> 2389:  change "are a possible." to "are possible.".
> 2393:  Section "1.2.2 Multimedia container formats in scope" and section
> "5.2.3 Multimedia container formats mapping tables" in the ontology document
> are not complete (missing examples and mappings respectively).  It does not
> seem a good idea to me to have empty mapping tables in the document.
> 2398: ok
> 2403: I would extend the example in the ontology document, now the title
> sais: "How to use the POWDER protocol for publishing descriptions of media
> resources". Maybe it's better to say: "How to use the POWDER protocol for
> publishing descriptions of multiple media resources.".
> Also, this example depends on the RDF version of our ontology so we should
> add a descriptive introduction to the example.
> 2404: change "ontlogy" to "ontology". I find the answer confusing, will the
> RDF appendix be part of this ontology document or not?  BTW, the RDF-version
> has no identifiers for the different classes and properties!
> 2405: I guess the answer should say: "we changed this" and not "we will
> change this".
>   Also it sais: "A paragraph will be added that specifies the purpose of the
> specification and its scope: the property list, its RDF implementation and
> the set of mappings.". Where is this paragraph?
> The changes to the mapping table are not done.
> It sais: "and will have to correct this in the last place where the
> confusion unfortunately still figures in the document.". Where is this in
> the document?
> 2411: The example of broadcast date still has to be added.
> 2417: The answer is done, but the changes have not been done yet.
> 2418 :  The answer sais: " We agreed with your editorial comments and will
> implement them in the coming weeks."  Now I am confused about the goal of
> the answers to the LC comments (in general), is it to state what we will
> change or is it to state that we did change something according to the
> request?
> The XPATH expressions still need to be changed.
>
> API:
> 2394: This answer has a "TODO" in it.
> 2395: The statement about exceptions has not been added yet.
> 2406: ok.
> 2410: ok.
> 2419: This answer has "TODO's" in it.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:03 PM
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: review the 6 LC comments pending
>
> All MAWG participants,
>
>
> We have currently 6 LC comments for which we have a drafted "Proposed
> Resolution" [status="pending"]
>
> Please review these 6 comment responses and send feedback to the MAWG
> mailing if needed.
> If there are no issue raised by the next telecon meeting next tuesday on
> these responses to comments, we will consider those as *resolved by the
> MAWG* [status="resolved-yes"]
>
> LC Comments to review:
>
> 1-List of comments on "Ontology for Media Resource 1.0:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/
> 2389:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/
> 2393:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/
> 2417:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/
> 2404:
>
> 2-List of comments on "Ontology for API Resource 1.0:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-2010
> 0608/2395
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-2010
> 0608/2410?cid=2410
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry.
>
>
Received on Monday, 27 September 2010 12:47:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 September 2010 12:47:56 GMT