W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2010

RE: OWL FULL or DL?

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:47:47 +0200
To: 'Victor Rodriguez Doncel' <victorr@ac.upc.edu>
CC: 'RaphaŽl Troncy' <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, 'Yves Raimond' <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Tobias BŁrger <tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010CEEB7F27C@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
Thanks Victor.

I am personally quite agnostic. OWL 2 is an option but the question is still the same in terms of acceptance and penetration. How do you see this?

We can chat over this in Guangzhou in 2 weeks.

JP

From: Victor Rodriguez Doncel [mailto:victorr@ac.upc.edu]
Sent: mercredi, 22. septembre 2010 12:42
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: 'RaphaŽl Troncy'; 'Yves Raimond'; Tobias BŁrger; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: OWL FULL or DL?

Will not be OWL 2.0 directly used?
Problems could be overcome if the right profile is chosen...

Victor

Evain, Jean-Pierre escribiů:

I don't have to justify myself and give names. I am reporting what I hear from discussions on different reflectors dated yesterday (not browsing all chats).



If people have concerns about the compatibility of OWL FULL, that's enough for me to ring a bell.  I need  more than what you said to reassure me on the choice (although as I inferred in my previous mail some OWL FULL features are attractive).



What would tell me that OWL FULL is well supported? References please...



Jean-Pierre





-----Original Message-----

From: RaphaŽl Troncy [mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr]

Sent: mercredi, 22. septembre 2010 12:02

To: Evain, Jean-Pierre

Cc: 'Yves Raimond'; Tobias BŁrger; public-media-annotation@w3.org<mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>

Subject: Re: OWL FULL or DL?





On the other hand, there are voices/concerns about the support of OWL

FULL by current implementations of OWL APIs.





Old and useless debate.

What are these voices/concerns? References please ...



   RaphaŽl
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 11:03:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 September 2010 11:04:00 GMT