W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2010

Re: OWL FULL or DL?

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:01:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4C99D402.7090904@eurecom.fr>
To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
CC: 'Yves Raimond' <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Tobias BŁrger <tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
> On the other hand, there are voices/concerns about the support of OWL
> FULL by current implementations of OWL APIs.

Old and useless debate.
What are these voices/concerns? References please ...

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 10:10:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 September 2010 10:10:49 GMT