W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2010

RE: Latest FOAF version?

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:51:51 +0200
To: 'Yves Raimond' <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
CC: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010CEEB7F24B@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
Look at my other message. I am astounded by what is really behind it.  This is without referring to some battles around the mapping to DC...

- properties linking things to things
- duplicates inc. with different writing conventions...

A long list of curious things there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Raimond [mailto:yves.raimond@gmail.com] 
Sent: lundi, 20. septembre 2010 16:36
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: Tobias Bürger; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: Latest FOAF version?

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> wrote:
> Thanks Tobias.
>
> Yes, hopefully. No annotation giving a reference to the version and the namespace is still 0.1 ;-)

Well, they can't really change anymore, without breaking all their
URIs... And 'cool URIs don't change'. I remember Dan Brickley saying
that FOAF is stuck to version 0.1 for life now :)

A good reason to only use versioned URIs for information resources :)

Best,
y

>
> I'll look at that one.
>
> Regards, JP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tobias Bürger [mailto:tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at]
> Sent: lundi, 20. septembre 2010 11:22
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Latest FOAF version?
>
>  Should be here: http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20100809.rdf
>
> Am 20.09.2010 11:16, schrieb Evain, Jean-Pierre:
>> I found .98 but would like the .rdf
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evain, Jean-Pierre
>> Sent: lundi, 20. septembre 2010 11:13
>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Latest FOAF version?
>>
>> Anyone who can point me to the latest version of FOAF.
>>
>> Can't access the technical documentation from the foaf-project page.
>>
>> Version 0.9 seems to have most recent changes dating 2007??
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Jean-pierre
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it
>> are confidential and intended solely for the
>> use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error,
>> please notify the system manager.
>> This footnote also confirms that this email
>> message has been swept by the mailgateway
>> **************************************************
>
> --
> ================================================================
> Dr. Tobias Bürger         Knowledge and Media Technologies Group
> Salzburg Research                           FON +43.662.2288-415
> Forschungsgesellschaft                      FAX +43.662.2288-222
> Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/III   tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at
> A-5020 Salzburg | AUSTRIA         http://www.salzburgresearch.at
>
>
Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 14:52:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 14:52:32 GMT