RE: Latest FOAF version?

Let me be a little bit provocative here ;-)

Has anyone seriously looked at the FOAF RDF recently...

And FOAF is the winner ?!?!?!?!?!? At least it is the most intensive user of literals ;-)

Any views on FOAF other than 'it's cool!'

I know, I know, as I said in introduction, just a little bit provocative :-))

Jean-pierre

-----Original Message-----
From: Tobias Bürger [mailto:tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at] 
Sent: lundi, 20. septembre 2010 11:27
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: Latest FOAF version?

  It should be the most current one according to the change log as the 
version includes the new foaf:focus term...

Best,

Tobias

Am 20.09.2010 11:24, schrieb Evain, Jean-Pierre:
> Thanks Tobias.
>
> Yes, hopefully. No annotation giving a reference to the version and the namespace is still 0.1 ;-)
>
> I'll look at that one.
>
> Regards, JP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tobias Bürger [mailto:tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at]
> Sent: lundi, 20. septembre 2010 11:22
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Latest FOAF version?
>
>    Should be here: http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20100809.rdf

>
> Am 20.09.2010 11:16, schrieb Evain, Jean-Pierre:
>> I found .98 but would like the .rdf
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evain, Jean-Pierre
>> Sent: lundi, 20. septembre 2010 11:13
>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Latest FOAF version?
>>
>> Anyone who can point me to the latest version of FOAF.
>>
>> Can't access the technical documentation from the foaf-project page.
>>
>> Version 0.9 seems to have most recent changes dating 2007??
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Jean-pierre
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it
>> are confidential and intended solely for the
>> use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error,
>> please notify the system manager.
>> This footnote also confirms that this email
>> message has been swept by the mailgateway
>> **************************************************

-- 
================================================================
Dr. Tobias Bürger         Knowledge and Media Technologies Group
Salzburg Research                           FON +43.662.2288-415
Forschungsgesellschaft                      FAX +43.662.2288-222
Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/III   tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at
A-5020 Salzburg | AUSTRIA         http://www.salzburgresearch.at

Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 14:32:46 UTC