W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > October 2010

RE: ma-ont RDF latest version

From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:34:22 +0200
To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09F965A335476@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
Dear Davy, Jean-Pierre, all,

I agree with the proposal that a media fragment is a subclass of media resource. 

Actually, this a clean way of modeling it, as we anyway couldn't prevent someone from expressing that by using a MFURI as the URI of a media resource.

Best regards,
Werner


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010 15:25
> To: Davy Van Deursen
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE : ma-ont RDF latest version
> 
> Hi Davy,
> 
> Thank for summarsing the semantics, that will help me answering the
> question... (I hope :-)
> 
> [[ Therefore, we should first look at the definition of a media
> resource [1] and I believe that a media fragment
> falls under that definition (if not, please clarify why not):
> " A media resource is any physical or logical Resource that can be
> identified using a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), as defined
> by [RFC 3986]) , which has or is related to one or more media content
> types."  More specifically, a media fragment is a physical
> resource, with a media content type (i.e., the same as its parent
> resource) and can be identified using a URI (i.e., a Media
> Fragments URI).]]
> 
> This is effectively the key question and I would inviote the whole MAWG
> to consider this question.
> 
> My first intention would have been to have media fragment as a subclass
> of media resource composed of audio and video tracks. If we all adopt
> and recognise more specifically that a fragment is a media resource
> which is iodentified by a MFURI I am happy with this but the group
> needs to confirm what the mediaFragment is. Then we could name
> (namedFragment, itself a subclass of fragment) and keyword a fragment
> and give him a URI. That would be 'clean'.
> 
> Then  if the question arises of whether a media fragment is a subclass
> of media resource, I would answer that any media resource is an atomic
> media fragment.
> 
> In other words, I personally can agree with what you suggest but would
> like to hear from the group.
> 
> Tobias and team, what do you think?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jean-Pierre
> -----------------------------------------
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error,
> please notify the system manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email
> message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
> 
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 13:35:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 14 October 2010 13:35:16 GMT