W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > October 2010

RE : RE : ma-ont RDF latest version

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:33:05 +0200
To: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at>
CC: "Höffernig, Martin" <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010D2240FA63@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
Absolutely right. In fact we started doing this in previous versions. What would be really good is for MAWG to define what they expect will be queries and add properties starting from there.

Regards,

JP

________________________________________
De : Tobias Bürger [tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at]
Date d'envoi : mercredi, 13. octobre 2010 15:34
À : Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc : "Höffernig, Martin"; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Objet : Re: RE : ma-ont RDF latest version

  Hi!

One point which is still open is to add the inverse properties of the
subproperties of contributorIs below isContributor. For some
subproperties inverse properties are available, for others like
copyrightHolderIs, ratingProviderIs, targetAudienceAuthorityIs no
inverse property is available (yet).

Best regards!

Tobias

Am 13.10.2010 08:44, schrieb Evain, Jean-Pierre:
> HI Martin,
>
> all comments make sense.  Disjoints were used in earlier versions but then were unduly removed during some debugging tasks.
>
> Here is a new version with all your suggestions implemented (or so I believe :-). Please have a look and feedback.
>
> Best regards from Guangzhou,
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Höffernig, Martin [Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at]
> Date d'envoi : mardi, 12. octobre 2010 08:37
> À : public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : Re: ma-ont RDF latest version
>
> Hi all,
>
> here are my comments concerning the latest verson of ma-ont:
>
> Shouldn't the top level classes (Concept, Agent, Collection, Contributor, Location, MediaFragment, MediaResource) be disjoint or overlapping?
> Since these classes are not overlapping, they should be marked as disjoint.
>
> All subclasses of class Contributer - execpt class RatingProvider - have property restrictions (e.g. Actor actorIs some Person).
> Though an appropriate property - ratingProviderIs - is available.
>
> Since now only some Contributor subclasses are described using property restrictions. Is there the intention to add property restrictions to the remaining classes as well?
>
> The range definition for property duration is "MediaResource and not Image".
> An alternative way to describe this would be "AudioTrack or VideoTrack" (without negation) which could be easier to understand/interpret.
> The range definition for properties frameHeight, frameRate, frameWidth and samplingRate can be rephrased in a similar fashion.
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 05. Oktober 2010 11:39
> An: 'tmichel@w3.org'
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Betreff: RE: ma-ont RDF latest version
>
> As requested...
>
> Regards, JP
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: mardi, 5. octobre 2010 11:31
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ma-ont RDF latest version
>
> Could you add inside the file, in a comment,  a version number (like
> R12) and a date. It will ease when inserting the file into the Ont spec to track the version.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thierry
>
> Le 05/10/2010 09:22, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>> Thanks Thierry.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>> Sent: lundi, 4. octobre 2010 22:16
>> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: ma-ont RDF latest version
>>
>> Now Linked from the MA WG home page
>>
>> Le 04/10/2010 14:27, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Please find attached the latest RDF version of the ontology. It is usually Tobias who post this on the reflector but he has problems with one of his servers and couldn't post the document before leaving. He therefore asked me to do it.
>>>
>>> Of course this will likely need to be updated as the ontology integrates all comments received.
>>>
>>> Some sub-properties are there to illustrate the implementation of some examples given in the semantics.
>>>
>>> Best regards, Jean-Pierre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system
>> manager.
>> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
>> the mailgateway
>> **************************************************
> >

--
================================================================
Dr. Tobias Bürger         Knowledge and Media Technologies Group
Salzburg Research                           FON +43.662.2288-415
Forschungsgesellschaft                      FAX +43.662.2288-222
Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/III   tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at
A-5020 Salzburg | AUSTRIA         http://www.salzburgresearch.at
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2010 14:35:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 October 2010 14:35:06 GMT