W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > October 2010

[Reminder] Response to your LC Comment -2417 on Media Ontology spec

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:07:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4CB2C5AA.8080500@w3.org>
To: renato@iannella.it, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Dear Renato,

The Media Annotations Working Group has responded (see email bellow) to 
the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the 
Ontlology for Media
Resource 1.0 published on 08 June 2010.

The deadline for responding to our proposal was October 09-oct-2010.
We have not receive any message from you.
If we don't get a response by the end of this week (Saturday 16th 
October), we will consider that you have fully agreed to our proposal.
We can not delay more the publication track of the Ontology for Media
Resource 1.0.

Best,

Thierry



--------------


Dear Renato,

The Media Annotations Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent
[1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Ontlology for Media
Resource 1.0 published on 08 June 2010.
Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send
us comments.

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.
Please review it carefully and *let us know by email at
public-media-annotation@w3.org if you agree with it* or not before
deadline date [09-oct-2010].
In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group.
If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the
opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by
the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in
the W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Media Annotations Working Group,
Thierry Michel,
W3C Team Contact

1.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Aug/0003.html
2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/

-----------------
MAWG Resolution:
------------------

Proposed definition of ma:policy

Thank you for this proposal, we agree that this is better than the
current definition of ma:policy, which has a policy attribute that can
be either a string or URI. We will adopt your proposed definition of
ma:policy, and include your examples to illustrate the use of this property.

- Recommended vocabulary for ma:policy.type

We will add that it is recommended to use a subset of policy related
terms of the Meta information from the XHTML Vocabulary [1] for
ma:policy.type.

- Overlap between ma:policy and ma:copyright

We agree with your comment that there is an overlap between ma:copyright
and the case of using the ma:policy element to express a copyright
statement. The decision to keep ma:copyright despite this overlap was
made for reasons of usability and compatibility with current industry
practice, as discussed by David Singer on the mailing list (see thread
starting with [2]). Given this requirement, the only option to
completely avoid overlap would be to define ma:copyright and ma:policy
as mutually exclusive, which we do not consider a good option, as it
would rather discourage making use of ma:policy and providing more
detailed information. ma:copyright and ma:policy can co-exist in an
annotation to serve different needs, even if they are partially
overlapping in some cases.

[1] http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/#
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Aug/0004.html
Received on Monday, 11 October 2010 08:07:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 October 2010 08:07:20 GMT