W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2010

RE: Request for LC approvals

From: 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:29:22 +0900
Message-ID: <B4EAD1122C31304099A5CDEA5447210F01E16E41@email2>
To: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi. All.

Concerning to the Open issues of API doc for going LC [1] of wiki page,

I have done below issues.

(6) Section 2.3.8.1 FrameSize (by wonsuk) à Done

(7) "Section 2.3.8.4 Format (by wonsuk) à Done

(8) "Section 2.3.8.5 Samplingrate (by wonsuk) à Done

(9) "API for retrieval of reason of an error" Is there a reason to use this approach instead of an error callback or an exception? Note that what getDiagnosis() is supposed to be called on is unclear. (by Chris and wonsuk) à Done with proposed input from Florian and Tobias.

 

Not yet.

(3) Title: Why just "Album title" and "Song title"? A *lot* of other things can have titles. (by wonsuk) à 서브타입 정리

(4) Section 2.3.2.3 CreationDate (by Wonsuk and John)

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Issues_for_LC#Open_issues_of_API_doc_for_going_LC


 

Best regards,

Wonsuk.

 

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 이원석
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 1:19 AM
To: Joakim Söderberg
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: Request for LC approvals

 

Hi. Joakim and all.

Sorry for late work. Because after came back to my office, I had a few urgent work for my company including moving my lab to another building.

So I couldn’t do my APs. I would like to do my work until the Monday next week ;)

 

Best regards,

Wonsuk.

 

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joakim Soderberg
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:02 PM
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: Request for LC approvals

 

Dear editors and AP holders,

 

Please check your APs until tomorrow so we can let the specifications go on LC as agreed!

 

Many thanks

/Joakim

 

 

 

JOAKIM SÖDERBERG M.Sc, Ph.D 
Multimedia Indexing, Senior Research Engineer, co-Chair W3C MAWG 


Ericsson Research
Multimedia Technologies
Sweden
SMS/MMS +46761263915
www.ericsson.com 



 

 

This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer 

 

 

________________________________

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joakim Söderberg
Sent: den 28 april 2010 17:08
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Request for LC approvals

Dear WG members,

 

I hereby ask for your approval to go on Last Call for the "Ontology for Media Resource 1.0" (http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html) and "API for Media Resource 1.0" (http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html), with the inclusion of the following updates: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/index.php?title=Issues_for_LC, which will be applied before May 7. 

 

Best Regards

Joakim Söderberg & Daniel Soohong

co-Chair

MAWG



image001.gif
(image/gif attachment: image001.gif)

image002.gif
(image/gif attachment: image002.gif)

Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:30:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 May 2010 11:30:06 GMT